<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Puzzle I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/</link>
	<description>Logorrhea in blog form; a place to spill my brain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:14:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TAG, you&#8217;re it &#171; Blogorrhea</title>
		<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>TAG, you&#8217;re it &#171; Blogorrhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment on Obedience is better than… by limejellyComment on Sacra-licious by Mike SComment on Puzzle I by Puzzle III.4: Epilogue « BlogorrheaComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by Puzzle III.4: Epilogue « BlogorrheaComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by RubeRadComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by the foresterComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by RubeRadComment on Obedience is better than… by the foresterComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by the foresterComment on Sacra-licious by Mike S [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment on Obedience is better than… by limejellyComment on Sacra-licious by Mike SComment on Puzzle I by Puzzle III.4: Epilogue « BlogorrheaComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by Puzzle III.4: Epilogue « BlogorrheaComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by RubeRadComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by the foresterComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by RubeRadComment on Obedience is better than… by the foresterComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by the foresterComment on Sacra-licious by Mike S [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puzzle III.4: Epilogue &#171; Blogorrhea</title>
		<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>Puzzle III.4: Epilogue &#171; Blogorrhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1897</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by RubeRadComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by the foresterComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by RubeRadComment on Obedience is better than… by the foresterComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by the foresterComment on Sacra-licious by Mike SComment on Sacra-licious by RubeRadComment on Sacra-licious by Albino HayfordComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by Puzzle III.2: Combinations « BlogorrheaComment on Puzzle I by Puzzle III.3: Big Numbers « Blogorrhea [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by RubeRadComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by the foresterComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by RubeRadComment on Obedience is better than… by the foresterComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by the foresterComment on Sacra-licious by Mike SComment on Sacra-licious by RubeRadComment on Sacra-licious by Albino HayfordComment on Puzzle III.3: Final Answer by Puzzle III.2: Combinations « BlogorrheaComment on Puzzle I by Puzzle III.3: Big Numbers « Blogorrhea [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puzzle III.3: Big Numbers &#171; Blogorrhea</title>
		<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>Puzzle III.3: Big Numbers &#171; Blogorrhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>[...] Puzzle I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Puzzle I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puzzle III.2: Combinations &#171; Blogorrhea</title>
		<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Puzzle III.2: Combinations &#171; Blogorrhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>[...] Puzzle I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Puzzle I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puzzle II &#171; Blogorrhea</title>
		<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Puzzle II &#171; Blogorrhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment on Pope v. Islam by the foresterComment on Pope v. Islam by the foresterComment on Pope v. Islam by Aunt BarbaraComment on Moses’ Law is not God’s Law by AnonymousComment on Puzzle I by RubeRadComment on Puzzle I by BruceComment on Puzzle I by RubeRadComment on Puzzle I by BruceComment on Pope v. Islam by Aunt BarbaraComment on Pope v. Islam by RubeRad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment on Pope v. Islam by the foresterComment on Pope v. Islam by the foresterComment on Pope v. Islam by Aunt BarbaraComment on Moses’ Law is not God’s Law by AnonymousComment on Puzzle I by RubeRadComment on Puzzle I by BruceComment on Puzzle I by RubeRadComment on Puzzle I by BruceComment on Pope v. Islam by Aunt BarbaraComment on Pope v. Islam by RubeRad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RubeRad</title>
		<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>RubeRad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>Look at you!  You &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; smart, aren&#039;t you!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at you!  You <em>are</em> smart, aren&#8217;t you!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>Does that mean that, while I got the right answer, I don&#039;t win the free BMW on some technicality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that mean that, while I got the right answer, I don&#8217;t win the free BMW on some technicality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RubeRad</title>
		<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>RubeRad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>We have an early winner!  And in an abstruse-enough edge-listing format that anybody else that attempts will not necessarily comprehend the answer.

I&#039;ll note that, while correct, there is a sense in which that is not the &#039;easiest-possible&#039; answer, where &#039;easiest-possible&#039; means describable just with concise English.  I can name that tune in, ummm, four words...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have an early winner!  And in an abstruse-enough edge-listing format that anybody else that attempts will not necessarily comprehend the answer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll note that, while correct, there is a sense in which that is not the &#8216;easiest-possible&#8217; answer, where &#8216;easiest-possible&#8217; means describable just with concise English.  I can name that tune in, ummm, four words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1672</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruberad.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/puzzle-i/#comment-1672</guid>
		<description>black={1,2}, {1,5}, {2,4}, {3,4}, {3,5}
red= {1,3}, {1,4}, {2,3}, {2,5}, {4,5}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>black={1,2}, {1,5}, {2,4}, {3,4}, {3,5}<br />
red= {1,3}, {1,4}, {2,3}, {2,5}, {4,5}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
