Calvin on Anabaptists

Just ran across a nice quote from Calvin showing what he had to deal with in his day:

Certain Anabaptists of our day conjure up some sort of frenzied excess instead of spiritual regeneration. The children of God, they assert, restored to the state of innocence, now need not take care to bridle the lust of the flesh, but should rather follow the Spirit as their guide, under whose impulsion they can never go astray. It would be incredible that a man’s mind should fall into such madness, if they did not openly and haughtily blab this dogma of theirs. The thing is indeed monstrous! But it is fitting that those who have persuaded their minds to turn God’s truth into falsehood should suffer such punishments for their sacrilegious boldness. Shall all choice between dishonest and honest, righteous and unrighteous, good and evil, virtue and vice, be thus taken away? “Such difference arises,” they say, “from the curse of old Adam, from which we have been freed through Christ.” Therefore, there will now be no difference between fornication and chastity, integrity and cunning, truth and falsehood, fair dealing and extortion. “Take away,” say the Anabaptists, “vain fear — the Spirit will command no evil of you if you but yield yourself, confidently and boldly, to his prompting.” Who would not be astonished at these monstrosities? Yet it is a popular philosophy among those who are blinded by the madness of lusts and have put off common sense.

Tossed about by every wind of doctrine.

H&S: Confessionalism Afterparty

Nothing too organized here, just some post-debate thoughts:

  • Everybody there had an astounding time!
  • One thing you can’t get from the audio: a couple of times, Davie said “scripture” or “my bible”, and reflexively held up his iPod.  I’m not saying it’s bad to read the bible on an iPod, it’s just funny.
  • Also, when Davie recommends that all the heads of all the denominations in the world be locked in a room with only bibles until they come to an agreement, the hilarious interjection of “they’d write a confession” came not from Brian, but from Blogorrhea regular, Kazooless, a.k.a. The Onomist, sitting with me in the front row.  Audio listeners will miss out on the look on Davie’s face.
  • On that topic, I thought the whole “lock ‘em in a room” idea was pretty silly (or at least naive).  Even without their confessions, the heads of all the world’s denominations would still be bringing in their disparate hermeneutics and interpretations, which are equivalent to their confessions, which is the whole (correct) point of Brian’s argument that confessions are like bellybuttons: everybody’s got one.  (And for that matter, why doesn’t Davie want to lock the heads of all the world’s non-denominations into that room too?)
  • I’d like some historical backup for those claims about Calvin and Zwingli executing people.  I know what was going on with Servetus in particular, but I had never heard those charges about so many others.

So if you were there, or if you listened to the .mp3s, what did you think?

Hoagies & Stogies: Confessionalism

MP3 are IN:

If you want .mp3 for any other H&S, head on over here and poke around.

In other news, here’s a real quick beer survey, so you can give the Brewmaster feedback on how he could possibly make his beer any more awesome!

Also, thanks to Frank Hueso, who thanked me for my work with H&S by giving me a T-shirt he designed with a cool Sola Scriptura graphic on it. I’ve asked for some graphics of all his designs, so stay tuned to this site for images when I get ‘em!

Calvin on Law & Gospel

While preparing to teach on II Cor 3:16, I ran across a great passage from Calvin’s commentary on II Cor 3:7.  And since my blog has been in a dearth lately, I thought a little cut & paste would be in order.  Commenting on the phrase “ministry of death,” Calvin turns to the question, isn’t the Gospel also a ministry of death?  Take it away, Johnny C!

Here, however, a question arises: As the gospel is the odor of death unto death to some, (2 Cor 2:16,) and as Christ is a rock of offense, and a stone of stumbling set for the ruin of many (Luke 2:34; 1 Pet 2:8) why does he represent, as belonging exclusively to the law, what is common to both? Should you reply, that it happens accidentally that the gospel is the source of death, and, accordingly, it the occasion of it rather than the cause, inasmuch as it is in its own nature salutary to all, the difficulty will still remain unsolved; for the same answer might be returned with truth in reference to the law. For we hear what Moses called the people to bear witness to — that he had set before them life and death. (Deut 30:15) We hear what Paul himself says in Rom 7:10 — that the law has turned out to our ruin, not through any fault attaching to it, but in consequence of our wickedness. Hence, as the entailing of condemnation upon men is a thing that happens alike to the law and the gospel, the difficulty still remains.

My answer is this — that there is, notwithstanding of this, a great difference between them; for although the gospel is an occasion of condemnation to many, it is nevertheless, on good grounds, reckoned the doctrine of life, because it is the instrument of regeneration, and offers to us a free reconciliation with God. The law, on the other hand, as it simply prescribes the rule of a good life, does not renew men’s hearts to the obedience of righteousness, and denounces everlasting death upon transgressors, can do nothing but condemn. Or if you prefer it in another way, the office of the law is to show us the disease, in such a way as to show us, at the same time, no hope of cure: the office of the gospel is, to bring a remedy to those that were past hope. For as the law leaves man to himself, it condemns him, of necessity, to death; while the gospel, bringing him to Christ, opens the gate of life. Thus, in one word, we find that it is an accidental property of the law, that is perpetual and inseparable, that it killeth; for as the Apostle says elsewhere, (Gal 3:10) “All that remain under the law are subject to the curse.” It does, not, on the other hand, invariably happen to the gospel, that it kills, for in it is revealed the righteousness of God from faith to faith, and therefore it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth. (Rom 1:17-18).

It remains, that we consider the last of the properties that are ascribed. The Apostle says, that the law was but for a time, and required to be abolished, but that the gospel, on the other hand, remains for ever. There are various reasons why the ministry of Moses is pronounced transient, for it was necessary that the shadows should vanish at the coming of Christ, and that statement — “The law and the Prophets were until John” (Matt 11:13) – applies to more than the mere shadows. For it intimates, that Christ has put an end to the ministry of Moses, which was peculiar to him, and is distinguished from the gospel. Finally, the Lord declares by Jeremiah, that the weakness of the Old Testament arose from this — that it was not engraven on men’s hearts. (Jer 31:32-33) For my part, I understand that abolition of the law, of which mention is here made, as referring to the whole of the Old Testament, in so far as it is opposed to the gospel, so that it corresponds with the statement “The law and the Prophets were until John.” For the context requires this. For Paul is not reasoning here as to mere ceremonies, but shows how much more powerfully the Spirit of God exercises his power in the gospel, than of old under the law.

Institutes .mp3

For any who might be trying to keep up with the Princeton Seminary’s Reading Schedule for Calvin’s Institutes, here’s a helpful tip for how to download the .mp3 recorded readings for listening away from the computer.

  1. Log in to Google Reader.  If you have ever signed up for any of Google’s free services (gmail, picasaweb, etc.) then you already have a Google account that should work for Reader.  If you haven’t, you can create one for free.
  2. Once logged into Google Reader, click on the button that says “Add a Subscription”.
  3. Copy+Paste http://www2.ptsem.edu/ConEd/calvin/rss/ and click ‘Add’.
  4. If you click on “A Year With the Institutes”, you should be able to use the scroll bar to access all of the Institutes readings, back to the the beginning of the year. (Sub-tip 4a: Make sure you click “Show: all items” in the upper-leftish area, not just “new items”)
  5. If you open any of those posts (click on the summary bar for that post), you will see the book/chapter/sections for that reading in a bold blue font, which is directly linked to the .mp3 for that reading (the name of the .mp3 file is the date of the reading).  Right-click on it, and you can save it to your own computer.  From that point, hopefully you know how to get it onto your iPod or other .mp3 player.

If you don’t want to create a Google account, you can use this account:

    Email:    readtheinst@mailinator.com
    Password: calvinrocks

Then go to step 4 above.

Communion & Presence

Some thoughts on last week’s Hoagies & Stogies: Communion.

It was a really good one — the largest ever with about 80 men present, and many told me how much they liked the debate.  The distinction between Lutheran Real Physical Presence and Reformed Real Spiritual Presence was clear, and the debate was vigorous.

Interestingly, Reformed pastor Mike Brown experienced a bit of a switch-up.  Last time, he was able to claim the “literal” high-ground, camping out on “it is a great sin to neglect baptism” in his argument for requiring all (Reformed) church members to baptize their infants.  But this time, Lutheran Pastor John Kent got to camp out on “This is my body,” forcing Brown to be on the defensive most of the time (until nearer the end, when he started to land some counterpunches).

Speaking of “literal high ground,” the Lutheran position’s boast of having the most literal, direct interpretation of Jesus’ words reminded me a lot of discussions with 6×24 advocates; as if “most literal” automatically means “most correct”.

Even though the Lutheran doctrine of Real Physical Presence is also known as Consubstantiation (contra RC Transubstantiation), the debate never really centered on the word or concept of substance.  How is the substance of Christ present in communion?  (I’m sure the Lutheran answer would have just been “Mystery! This is my body — just believe the words!”)  If Christ’s substance is physically present in, with, under the substance of the bread, then shouldn’t it be somehow scientifically detectable?  Conversely, if the bread remains as physically, substantively bread as it was before, where is there room for Christ’s physical substance?

Which brings me to another point; what is the precise working definition of “physical”?  Does it mean “material,” or “having mass”?  How does our modern, scientific notion of “physical” relate to to whatever Luther or Calvin might have been arguing about (being from an age that still thought in terms of the classical elements of fire, earth, air, water).  And if Christ’s presence doesn’t mean “having mass,” wouldn’t a good description of that be “spiritual”?

One more question I forgot to ask of the Lutheran side: what do they do with the leftover bread and wine?  I know that since the Reformed view is that the bread remains truly and only bread, as it was before, it is not uncommon at my church to see high-schoolers snacking on the leftovers.  But for Lutherans, that bread has the Real Physical Presence of Christ in, with, under it — how can they avoid adoration of the elements like the Catholics?

Hoagies & Stogies: Communion

What did Jesus mean by “this is my body”? Real Physical Presence (Lutherans) or Real Spiritual Presence (Calvinists)? About 80 men showed up at the largest H&S event ever, to hear pastors John Kent and Mike Brown tackle this question that is as old as the Reformation.

If you missed it (or if you didn’t!), you can download .mp3 from The Onomist’s archive:

  • Part 1: Opening, rebuttal, and closing statements (1:14:02, 16.9MB)
  • Part 2: Q&A (0:15:44, 3.6MB)

Dream-Car Raffle

Would you pay $25 for a Mercedes C300?  How about a BMW 128i convertible?  Audi A4?  Honda Odyssey?  Or perhaps $25,000 cash money?  These are the options for the grand prize winner of the “Catch a Ride with Cambridge” Dream-Car Raffle.  Tickets are $25 each, or $100 for 5.  In addition to the grand prize, there are 4 other cash prizes, so with a limit of 3000 tickets sold, chances of winning a prize are 1:600 for each ticket.  The drawing for the grand prize (and not-so-grand prizes) will be held on Apr 4, 2009, at the Cambridge Gala Auction.

The Cambridge School is a Christian school in the classical tradition, in its third year, with 60 students from pre-K to 3rd grade.  With two kids in the school, I figure I need to sell 100 tickets as their “fair share”.

Tickets can be purchased by fax or mail, using this entry form.  You do not have to travel to San Diego and attend the drawing to win, so come one and all!

More from Calvin the Short-Earther

More from Calvin:

Therein time was first marked so that by a continuing succession of years believers might arrive at the primal source of the human race and of all things. This knowledge is especially useful not only to resist the monstrous fables that formerly were in vogue in Egypt and in other regions of the earth, but also that, once the beginning of the universe is known, God’s eternity may shine forth more clearly, and we may be more rapt in wonder at it. And indeed, that impious scoff ought not to move us: that it is a wonder how it did not enter God’s mind sooner to found heaven and earth, but that he idly permitted an immeasurable time to pass away, since he could have made it very many millenniums earlier, albeit the duration of the world, now declining to its ultimate end, has not yet attained six thousand years. For it is neither lawful nor expedient for us to inquire why God delayed so long, because if the human mind strives to penetrate thus far, it will fail a hundred times on the way. And it would not even be useful for us to know what God himself, to test our moderation of faith, on purpose willed to be hidden. When a certain shameless fellow mockingly asked a pious old man what God had done before the creation of the world, the latter aptly countered that he had been building hell for the curious.
…Elsewhere [Augustine] wisely warns that it is no less wrong to raise questions concerning immeasurable stretches of time than of space. Indeed, however widely the circuit of the heavens extends, it still has some limit. Now if anyone should expostulate with God that the void exceeds the heavens a hundredfold, would not this impudence be detestable to all the godly? Into such madness leap those who carp at God’s idleness because he did not in accord with their judgment establish the universe innumerable ages before. To gratify their curiosity, they strive to go forth outside the world. As if in the vast circle of heaven and earth enough things do not present themselves to engross all our senses with their incomprehensible brightness! As if within six thousand years God has not shown evidences enough on which to exercise our minds in earnest meditation! Therefore let us willingly remain enclosed within these bounds to which God has willed to confine us, and as it were, to pen up our minds that they may not, through their very freedom to wander, go astray.

What confuses me is that Calvin seems to grant the premise that “God delayed so long” — we just shouldn’t be inquiring into why.  I wonder if he would appreciate an understanding that God did not “idly permit an immeasurable time to pass away”, but was quite busy with the work of Creation for “very many milleniums.”  Or that indeed that the “void” of space “exceeds the heavens” of our atmosphere (or even solar system!) “a hundredfold” and much more.

I’m Callin’ It

T-bird tells me that my blog has too much theological fighting, and not enough family news.  So here’s where we’re at:

#3 is huge.  At 42 inches and 38 pounds, he’s off the 3-year-old chizzart!  He’s almost as big as 5-year-old #2 (who’s not exactly a midget).  And he loves to sing.  Joy To the World (two whole verses), Speed Racer (instrumental), Hungry Like the Wolf, anything he hears, he sings.  Also, in emulation of his older brothers, he is excited about learning letters.  He can recognize his or his brothers’ names, and has even been known to try to scribble his own (although his ‘S’ has about 10 bends in it!)

The biggest news for #1 is that two weeks ago, he got glasses (bifocals!).  He’s excited about his glasses because (a) he can see, and (b) he’s now like some of his best friends at school — which he also loves.  He is also making good progress on the piano, playing pieces that really sound like music!  (#3 is starting to sing some of them, from hearing them practiced so often!)

I have saved #2 for last, because he’s got the biggest news at the moment (I think).  As the title suggests, “I’m calling it”.  No, he’s not dead, but after snuggling up with him and The Cat in the Hat Comes Back last weekend, I have decided that #2 now knows how to read.  He might not be able to figure out every word, but he has crossed the threshold from painfully sounding out individual words, to stringing words together in a sentence comfortably enough to understand what he’s reading.  I told him how exclamation points mean he has to make it sound exciting, and it’s funny to see how he notices an exclamation point coming up, and will back up to the beginning of the sentence and raise his voice and read it all again.  And all this from T’s extra-curricular teaching (the same method that was so successful with #1’s homeschooling).  In no time, I’m sure he’ll be a bona fide bookworm like #1.